2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-250 weights approximately 386 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-250 | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | E-250 | Elite |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1216 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 29 L |
