2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1964 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1964 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-250 weights approximately 312 kg more than 1964 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-250 | 1964 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | E-250 | 4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 38 L |
