2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1967 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-250 weights approximately 36 kg more than 1967 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1967 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-250 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2390 mm |