2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar E Type (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar E Type should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 434 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-250 | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | E-250 | E Type |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 63 L |
