2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1970 Skoda 1202
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1970 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1970 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Skoda 1202 weights approximately 139 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Skoda 1202. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1970 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | E-250 | 1202 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2690 mm |