2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1973 Mazda 929
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mazda 929 weights approximately 104 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1973 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-250 | 929 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |