2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1979 TVR 3000
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 TVR 3000 weights approximately 54 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1979 TVR 3000 has manual transmission. 1979 TVR 3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1979 TVR 3000 | |
Make | Ford | TVR |
Model | E-250 | 3000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 2992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2290 mm |