2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1980 Mini Clubman
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-250 weights approximately 312 kg more than 1980 Mini Clubman.
Because 2009 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1980 Mini Clubman has manual transmission. 1980 Mini Clubman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-250 | 1980 Mini Clubman | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | E-250 | Clubman |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 3410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2140 mm |
