2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Century would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1982 Buick Century. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Century.
Because 2009 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Buick Century. (224 Nm). This means 2009 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1982 Buick Century | |
Make | Ford | Buick |
Model | E-250 | Century |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 224 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1364 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2662 mm |