2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1982 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 184 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Because 2009 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1982 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | E-250 | Reliant |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2260 mm |