2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1987 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Mercury Sable weights approximately 434 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Because 2009 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1987 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | E-250 | Sable |
Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 2513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |