2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-250 weights approximately 96 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2009 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-250 | 100 1.4 D |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 89 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1380 mm |