2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (121 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Rover 200 weights approximately 74 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-250 | 200 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 121 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2510 mm |