2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1994 Rover 100

To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 100 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP) has 166 more horse power than 1994 Rover 100. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-250 weights approximately 82 kg more than 1994 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 100. (90 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 100. 2009 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1994 Rover 100 has manual transmission. 1994 Rover 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: