2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1995 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1995 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1995 Jaguar XJS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1995 Jaguar XJS has manual transmission. 1995 Jaguar XJS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1995 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-250 | XJS |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 222 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 82 L |