2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura CL would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1997 Acura CL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 614 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Because 2009 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | E-250 | CL |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |