2009 Ford E-250 vs. 2004 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 204 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Because 2004 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford E-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 2004 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-250 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1450 mm |