2009 Ford E-250 vs. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (165 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara weights approximately 444 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (220 Nm). This means 2009 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | E-250 | Grand Vitara |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 220 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |