2009 Ford E-250 vs. 2012 Volvo XC70

To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 914 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.

Because 2012 Volvo XC70 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford E-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC70 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford E-250.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford E-250 2012 Volvo XC70
Make Ford Volvo
Model E-250 XC70
Year Released 2009 2012
Body Type Van SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4606 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 225 HP 0 HP
Torque 388 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 1400 RPM
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 966 kg 1880 kg
Vehicle Length 6030 mm 4838 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1862 mm
Vehicle Height 2140 mm 1604 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2815 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 12.4 L/100km 10.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 15.7 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 132 L 70 L