2009 Ford E-350 vs. 1951 Rover P4
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rover P4 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1951 Rover P4. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1951 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Rover P4 weights approximately 420 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Rover P4. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 1951 Rover P4 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-350 | P4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2103 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 12 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 52 L |