2009 Ford E-350 vs. 1975 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (102 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 145 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda Cosmo.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford E-350 1975 Mazda Cosmo
Make Ford Mazda
Model E-350 Cosmo
Year Released 2009 1975
Body Type Van Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5408 cc 1970 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 255 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 475 Nm 167 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 12 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1115 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 2120 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2520 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 132 L 65 L