2009 Ford E-350 vs. 1977 Mazda 616
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-350 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 1977 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-350 | 616 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 12 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2480 mm |