2009 Ford E-350 vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-350 weights approximately 156 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2009 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford E-350 has automatic transmission and 1979 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | E-350 | Colt |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5406 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2310 mm |