2009 Ford E-350 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 360 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Because 2009 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | E-350 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5406 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 12 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2680 mm |