2009 Ford E-350 vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 576 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-350 | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | E-350 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 4228 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 15 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 57 L |
