2009 Ford E-350 vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan AA-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan AA-X would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan AA-X weights approximately 290 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Because 2009 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford E-350 has automatic transmission and 1995 Nissan AA-X has manual transmission. 1995 Nissan AA-X will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-350 | AA-X |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 12 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1260 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2530 mm |