2009 Ford E-350 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner weights approximately 249 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Because 2009 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (164 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner. 2009 Ford E-350 has automatic transmission and 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner has manual transmission. 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-350 | 1996 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | E-350 | Space Runner |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1833 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 164 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 15 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2530 mm |
