2009 Ford E-350 vs. 2000 TVR Tamora
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 TVR Tamora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 TVR Tamora would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 TVR Tamora (334 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2009 Ford E-350. (255 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 TVR Tamora should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 TVR Tamora weights approximately 264 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 TVR Tamora (514 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford E-350. (475 Nm). This means 2000 TVR Tamora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 2000 TVR Tamora | |
Make | Ford | TVR |
Model | E-350 | Tamora |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5409 cc | 3598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 334 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 514 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1230 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 57 L |