2009 Ford E-350 vs. 2001 Nissan Chappo
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Chappo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Chappo would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Chappo. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Chappo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Chappo weights approximately 319 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Because 2009 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Chappo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan Chappo. (359 Nm). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan Chappo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-350 | 2001 Nissan Chappo | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | E-350 | Chappo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2953 cc |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 15 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |
