2009 Ford E-350 vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (427 Nm). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | E-350 | Tundra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 12 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 45 L |