2009 Ford E-350 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 794 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | E-350 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 12 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 78 L |