2009 Ford E-350 vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-350 weights approximately 526 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-350 | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Westfield |
| Model | E-350 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2320 mm |
