2009 Ford E-350 vs. 2005 GMC Safari
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Safari would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2005 GMC Safari. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 989 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Because 2005 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Safari. (339 Nm). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-350 | 2005 GMC Safari | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | E-350 | Safari |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Van | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5406 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 12 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 102 L |
