2009 Ford E-350 vs. 2005 GMC Savana
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2005 GMC Savana. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Savana weights approximately 1364 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Savana. (353 Nm). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 2005 GMC Savana | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | E-350 | Savana |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 353 Nm |
Number of Seats | 15 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 117 L |