2009 Ford E-350 vs. 2005 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 2005 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | E-350 | Commander |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 12 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2790 mm |