2009 Ford E-350 vs. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Daewoo Tocsa would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 107 more horse power than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2009 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. (320 Nm). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-350 | 2007 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Ford | Daewoo |
| Model | E-350 | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 15 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
