2009 Ford E-350 vs. 2010 Maybach Landaulet
To start off, 2010 Maybach Landaulet is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Maybach Landaulet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Maybach Landaulet (604 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 349 more horse power than 2009 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Maybach Landaulet should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Maybach Landaulet (999 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 524 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford E-350. (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Maybach Landaulet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 2010 Maybach Landaulet | |
Make | Ford | Maybach |
Model | E-350 | Landaulet |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5409 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 604 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 999 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 6165 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1575 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3828 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 110 L |