2009 Ford Ecosport vs. 1983 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Corona. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Corona.
Because 1983 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Toyota Corona has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Toyota Corona will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ecosport | 1983 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ecosport | Corona |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 116 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4228 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |