2009 Ford Ecosport vs. 2002 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Voyager (145 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2009 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chrysler Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ecosport | 2002 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | Ford | Chrysler |
Model | Ecosport | Voyager |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4228 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2900 mm |