2009 Ford Ecosport vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo X670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo X670 (237 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Volvo X670 has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volvo X670 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ecosport | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ecosport | X670 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4228 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2815 mm |