2009 Ford Escape vs. 1963 MG 1100
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Escape (171 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Escape weights approximately 197 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Escape (303 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Escape | 1963 MG 1100 | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Escape | 1100 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6550 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 303 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1022 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2380 mm |