2009 Ford Escape vs. 1963 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Escape (171 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. (81 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Sunbeam Alpine weights approximately 64 kg more than 2009 Ford Escape.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Escape (302 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine. (126 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Escape | 1963 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
Model | Escape | Alpine |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6550 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 302 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 40 L |