2009 Ford Escape vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Escape (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 223 kg more than 2009 Ford Escape.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Escape (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Escape | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Escape | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 171 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
