2009 Ford Escape vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Escape (171 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 204 kg more than 2009 Ford Escape.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Escape (302 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Escape | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Escape | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 6550 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 302 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |