2009 Ford Escape vs. 1980 Zastava 132
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 132 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Escape (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Zastava 132 weights approximately 123 kg more than 2009 Ford Escape.
Because 1980 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Escape (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Escape | 1980 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Escape | 132 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2560 mm |