2009 Ford Escape vs. 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1258 kg more than 2009 Ford Escape.
Because 2009 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Escape | 1983 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Escape | Corniche |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1022 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3030 mm |