2009 Ford Escape vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Escape (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (119 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Escape (171 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Escape | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Escape | 75 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2486 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |