2009 Ford Expedition vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Ford Expedition is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Expedition (306 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Expedition. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Expedition (365 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Expedition | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Expedition | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 306 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2540 mm |
