2009 Ford Expedition vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Ford Expedition is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Expedition (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 204 kg more than 2009 Ford Expedition.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Expedition (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Expedition | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Expedition | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 64 L |
