2009 Ford Expedition vs. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara
To start off, 2009 Ford Expedition is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Monteverdi Sahara would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Expedition (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. (81 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara.
Because 2009 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Expedition | 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | |
Make | Ford | Monteverdi |
Model | Expedition | Sahara |
Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 3253 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2550 mm |